ConCourt mulls over payments in medico-legal cases
The Gauteng Health Department has pleaded poverty before the Constitutional Court, claiming that paying out lump sums for medico-legal cases would financially cripple it, but failed to substantiate this with evidence. In what a Business Day report calls a landmark case, the department applied to have the court determine if the ‘once and for all’ common law rule prohibited the payment of damages by way of future services.
Yesterday, 11 judges heard argument from the department’s Advocate Viwe Notshe SC, who told the court that lump sum payments hampered the department’s ability to fulfil its constitutional duty to provide healthcare.
State Attorney Kgosi Lekabe said the department was facing a double-edged sword that obliged it to pay for negligence victims but also to provide care for the entire population with a limited budget. The report adds when pressed by the judges, the applicants’ legal team was unable to present evidence to sway the judges that lump sum payments affected the ability of departments to function.
Article disclaimer: While we have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of this article, it is not intended to provide final legal advice as facts and situations will differ from case to case, and therefore specific legal advice should be sought with a lawyer.





