Khosa lawyer rubbishes SANDF report
The legal team representing the family of Collins Khosa has rejected an inquiry report by the SANDF, which cleared soldiers of causing Khosa's death.
‘The report by the SANDF is rubbish. We do not accept it; the evidence completely contradicts this report. It is ridiculous to say he died of some other cause,’ Wikus Steyl, of Ian Levitt Attorneys, reportedly told News24 yesterday.
He was reacting to news that an SANDF investigation had cleared the soldiers, finding that they could not be held liable for the 40-year-old's death because there was no link between the injuries he sustained due to their actions and his death.
The board, led by Brigadier Viscount Ngcobo, found that Khosa and his brother-in-law, Thabiso Muvhango, undermined the female soldiers who approached them about drinking alcohol in their yard. The report did not explain whether the soldiers had acted outside of their authority by addressing the men, who were drinking on private property.
Steyl said the inquiry – and its outcome – was merely a way for the SANDF to comply with the recent High Court judgment on the matter.
‘The family was definitely not interviewed by the SANDF for this inquiry. (It was) relying on the statements filed by the authorities, which does not make sense. It's a sham report; it cannot be legitimate. The SANDF just pretended to do an investigation to comply with the judgment,’ he explained.
The inquiry report notes that Khosa's relatives were not interviewed.
It relied only on the affidavits they filed with the police as part of their investigation. Steyl further added the family was in disbelief that what they witnessed on that fateful day was being dismissed.
The Gauteng High Court (Pretoria) recently heard the matter in an urgent application after Khosa was allegedly beaten to death by members of the SANDF in Alexandra, Johannesburg, in March, says the News24 report.
Judge Hans Fabricius ruled in favour of Khosa's family, finding that the right to dignity, life, the right not to be tortured in any way, and the right not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhumane or degrading way, cannot be suspended, even during a State of Emergency.
As a result, SAPS and the SANDF were directed by the court to, among others, suspend the soldiers, pending an investigation, and it had to develop a code of conduct for both SAPS and SANDF, as well as institute disciplinary proceedings.
The police have opened a murder docket on the matter and this is still ongoing.
Article disclaimer: While we have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of this article, it is not intended to provide final legal advice as facts and situations will differ from case to case, and therefore specific legal advice should be sought with a lawyer.





