Landmark ruling boost for divorcing spouses
The Gauteng High Court (Pretoria) has paved the way for divorcing spouses married out of community of property and without the accrual system to be financially compensated for their contribution to the marriage.
In what a Pretoria News report calls a groundbreaking judgment, the court declared section 7(3)(a) of Divorce Act 70 of 1979 unconstitutional in that it did not allow for a court to make a ‘redistribution order’.
Shani van Niekerk, of Adams & Adams Attorneys, who appeared for the Pretoria Attorneys Association – which entered the proceedings as a friend of the court – said this was a historic judgment, especially for women who previously stood to receive nothing if they were married out of community of property.
Van Niekerk explained that the practical effect of the judgment was that anyone divorcing who felt they had contributed to a marriage – whether directly or indirectly – could now apply for a fair share of the assets accumulated by the spouses during the marriage.
According to Van Niekerk, this extends especially to the women who have taken care of the children and household during the marriage, without working and earning an income.
The discretion to award a claim, however, still lies with the court and each case based on its merits, notes the Pretoria News report.
Judge Elmarie van der Schyff declared that this section of the Divorce Act was inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid to the extent that the provision limited some spouses to be compensated from the assets that both parties had worked towards during the marriage.
Van Niekerk, however, stressed that in terms of the court order, such a redistribution of assets was not an automatic entitlement.
In terms of the court order, a spouse instituting a claim under this section will still need to prove their direct or indirect contributions made towards the estate of the other spouse.
‘The court hearing such an application will then have to decide whether the claiming spouse is entitled to anything. The court will also have to decide on the extent of the claim, which may differ from matter to matter.’
Van Niekerk said the order would have far-reaching consequences ... and was expected to open the floodgates for spouses to get a fair share of what they put into the marriage.
The order, however, does not have any effect on spouses who are already divorced.
Article disclaimer: While we have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of this article, it is not intended to provide final legal advice as facts and situations will differ from case to case, and therefore specific legal advice should be sought with a lawyer.