Law preventing naming of rape accused challenged
An activist is challenging a law that prohibits publicly naming an accused charged with rape or other sexual offences before they have pleaded in court, says a GroundUp report.
Caroline Peters, founder of the Callas Foundation, wants the relevant section of the Criminal Procedure Act declared unconstitutional and invalid. She said it ‘constitutes a tool to silence women from speaking out against sexual offences’.
‘This constitutes indirect discrimination against women, who are primarily the victims of sexual violence, and thus violates the Constitution on the grounds of sex and gender,’ she said.
Peters, who is being represented by the Women’s Legal Centre, has filed her application in the Western Cape High Court against the Minister of Justice.
This comes as Peters herself faces charges for naming a person accused of rape in photographs she posted on social media. She has cited the accused, who was charged in August 2021 but has not yet pleaded, as the second respondent in the application.
The accused’s name has been redacted to comply with the provisions of the Act, referring to him only as Mr G, notes the report.
Peters said her activism is rooted in her own experience of being gang raped when she was 15.
‘More than three decades later, this memory remains vivid in my mind and has shaped the work I do to serve and protect the rights of women who become victims of sexual violence,’ she said in court papers.
Peters has published a legal notice alerting any interested party who may wish to join the application as a friend of the court.
Article disclaimer: While we have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of this article, it is not intended to provide final legal advice as facts and situations will differ from case to case, and therefore specific legal advice should be sought with a lawyer.





