Luxury hotel dispute heads to ConCourt
The shareholder war involving some of SA’s most luxurious hotels and lodges is heading to the Constitutional Court, where a Libyan-backed company will challenge a SCA ruling that, despite its interests having been unfairly disregarded, it must sell its stake and exit the business.
Ensemble Hotel Holdings, owned through a chain of Libyan investment entities, has approached the apex court seeking to overturn the ruling compelling it to sell its stake in Legacy Hotels & Resorts.
Legacy is led and controlled by veteran hotelier Bart Dorrestein.
The Sunday Times reports that the group owns luxury hotels, including the Leonardo and DAVINCI hotels in Sandton, the Commodore Hotel at the V&A Waterfront, and several luxury bush lodges, including Kwa Maritane.
Ensemble estimates that its 39.79% share in Legacy is worth about R600m, while entities associated with Dorrestein own 60% of the company.
The Michelangelo Hotel is wholly owned by Ensemble, but Legacy runs it through a management agreement.
Instead of having to sell its shares to Legacy, Ensemble wants the Constitutional Court to order that Legacy be auctioned off between the two parties.
If this fails, Ensemble wants the matter sent back to a differently constituted panel of the SCA to come up with a just and equitable remedy.
‘We are not seeking to perpetuate the deadlock or avoid a lawful separation. We are asking for a remedy that respects the right to a fair hearing, protects the value of the investment, and can lawfully be implemented,’ said Ensemble’s CEO, Ziad Jamal Ali El-Barag.
According to the papers, the relationship between Ensemble and Legacy deteriorated over the years owing to tensions and disagreements over corporate governance, control and transparency.
The Sunday Times notes that in 2021, Legacy’s majority shareholders sought to transfer lucrative hotel management contracts from Legacy Hotels to a company called Legacy Hospitality.
They argued that the sanctions imposed on entities in Ensemble’s Libyan ownership chain by the UN Security Council in 2011 created reputational issues and affected Legacy’s business negatively.
In papers, El-Barag says Dorrestein and other majority shareholders engineered the move to shift management contracts to Legacy Hospitality as a tactic to muscle Ensemble out of Legacy.
He also complained that, since he was not a director of Legacy Hospitality, he had no sight of the company’s business dealings, contracts and financials. He told judges that the main shareholders shut him out of the company by repeatedly and over many months refusing to give him financial records and other critical information to help him fulfil his fiduciary duties.
By 2022, El-Barag’s relationship with Dorrestein was so strained that he went to the High Court to demand, among other claims, Legacy’s financial records and that judges force a corporate divorce between Ensemble and Dorrestein through a private auction of shares for control of Legacy.
The Sunday Times notes that Dorrestein and his faction filed a counterclaim, arguing that Ensemble’s Libyan links prejudiced Legacy and amounted to oppressive conduct that impeded the company from doing business. In his Constitutional Court affidavit, El-Barag complains that the remedies awarded by the SCA favour Legacy over Ensemble, instead of correcting the wrongs committed by Legacy, as identified by both the High Court and the appeal court.
He questions why Ensemble is being pushed out and he is being forced to resign despite findings that the majority shareholder’s counterclaim failed and the company had unfairly withheld critical financial records from him.
‘The judgment gives no reason why Ensemble, rather than the majority, must be the party forced out,’ said El-Barag.
Article disclaimer: While we have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of this article, it is not intended to provide final legal advice as facts and situations will differ from case to case, and therefore specific legal advice should be sought with a lawyer.





