Find a South African Lawyer in SA's leading Legal Directory | southafricanlawyer.co.za

Areas of Law and Guides

Constitutional law is the body of law which defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. We've identified some articles that may be of interest to readers below.

Constitutional Law


The Constitution of South Africa is the supreme law of the country of South Africa. It provides the legal foundation for the existence of the republic, sets out the rights and duties of its citizens, and defines the structure of the government. The current constitution, the country's fifth, was drawn up by the Parliament elected in 1994 in the first non-racial elections. It was promulgated by President Nelson Mandela on 18th December 1996 and came into effect on 4 February 1997, replacing the Interim Constitution of 1993.

Since 1996, the Constitution has been amended by seventeen amendment acts. The Constitution is formally entitled the "Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996." It was previously also numbered as if it were an Act of Parliament—Act No. 108 of 1996—but, since the passage of the Citation of Constitutional Laws Act,neither it nor the acts amending it are allocated act numbers.

Negotiations

An integral part of the negotiations to end apartheid in South Africa was the creation of a new, non-discriminatory constitution (Tswana, Sotho, Northern Sotho: molaotheo; Afrikaans: grondwet; Zulu, Southern Ndebele: umthethosisekelo; Xhosa: umgaqo-siseko; Swazi: umtsetfosisekelo; Venda: vumbiwa; Tsonga: ndayotewa) for the country. One of the major disputed issues was the process by which such a constitution would be adopted. The African National Congress (ANC) insisted that it should be drawn up by a democratically-elected constituent assembly, while the governing National Party (NP) feared that the rights of minorities would not be protected in such a process, and proposed instead that the constitution be negotiated by consensus between the parties and then put to a referendum.

Formal negotiations began in December 1991 at the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA). The parties agreed on a process whereby a negotiated transitional constitution would provide for an elected constitutional assembly to draw up a permanent constitution. The CODESA negotiations broke down, however, after the second plenary session in May 1992. One of the major points of dispute was the size of the supermajority that would be required for the assembly to adopt the constitution: The NP wanted a 75 per cent requirement, which would effectively have given it a veto.

In April 1993, the parties returned to negotiations, in what was known as the Multi-Party Negotiating Process (MPNP). A committee of the MPNP proposed the development of a collection of "constitutional principles" with which the final constitution would have to comply, so that basic freedoms would be ensured and minority rights protected, without overly limiting the role of the elected constitutional assembly. The parties to the MPNP adopted this idea and proceeded to draft the Interim Constitution of 1993, which was formally enacted by Parliament and came into force on 27 April 1994.

Interim Constitution

The Interim Constitution provided for a Parliament made up of two houses: a 400-member National Assembly, directly elected by party-list proportional representation, and a ninety-member senate, in which each of the nine provinces was represented by ten senators, elected by the provincial legislature. The Constitutional Assembly consisted of both houses sitting together, and was responsible for drawing up a final constitution within two years. The adoption of a new constitutional text required a two-thirds supermajority in the Constitutional Assembly, as well as the support of two-thirds of senators on matters relating to provincial government. If a two-thirds majority could not be obtained, a constitutional text could be adopted by a simple majority and then put to a national referendum in which sixty per cent support would be required for it to pass.

The Interim Constitution contained 34 constitutional principles with which the new constitution was required to comply. These included multi-party democracy with regular elections and universal adult suffrage, supremacy of the constitution over all other law, a quasi-federal system in place of centralised government, non-racism and non-sexism, the protection of "all universally accepted fundamental rights, freedoms and civil liberties," equality before the law, the separation of powers with an impartial judiciary, provincial and local levels of government with democratic representation, and protection of the diversity of languages and cultures. The Bill of Rights, now in Chapter Two of the Constitution of South Africa, was largely written by Kader Asmal and Albie Sachs. The new constitutional text was to be tested against these principles by the newly established Constitutional Court. If the text complied with the principles, it would become the new constitution; if it did not, it would be referred back to the Constitutional Assembly.

Final text

The Constitutional Assembly engaged in a massive public participation programme to solicit views and suggestions from the public. As the deadline for the adoption of a constitutional text approached, however, many issues were hashed out in private meetings between the parties' representatives. On 8 May 1996, a new text was adopted with the support of 86 per cent of the members of the assembly, but in the First Certification judgment, delivered on 6 September 1996, the Constitutional Court refused to certify this text. The Constitutional Court identified a number of provisions that did not comply with the constitutional principles. Areas of non-compliance included failures to protect the right of employees to engage in collective bargaining; to provide for the constitutional review of ordinary statutes; to entrench fundamental rights, freedoms and civil liberties and to sufficiently safeguard the independence of the Public Protector and Auditor-General as well as other areas of non-compliance in relation to local government responsibilities and powers.

The Constitutional Assembly reconvened and, on 11 October, adopted an amended constitutional text containing many changes relative to the previous text. Some dealt with the court's reasons for non-certification, while others tightened up the text. The amended text was returned to the Constitutional Court to be certified, which the court duly did in its Second Certification judgment, delivered on 4 December. The Constitution was signed by President Mandela on 10 December and officially published in the Government Gazette on 18 December. It did not come into force immediately; it was brought into operation on 4 February 1997, by a presidential proclamation, except for some financial provisions which were delayed until 1 January 1998.

Since its adoption, the Constitution has been amended seventeen times.



Most recent Articles posted

Name change for Grahamstown 'final and settled'

The Department of Sport, Arts & Culture says that the 2018 name change of Grahamstown to Makhanda is final and settled, with the changes for Graaff-Reinet still being challenged.


DA challenges Expropriation Act in High Court

The Western Cape High Court will today begin to hear three separate constitutional challenges to the Expropriation Act, which is one of the main points of contention in the diplomatic standoff between SA and the US, reports News24.


NDPP won't oppose assisted dying ConCourt challenge

The NDPP will not oppose Dignity SA’s Constitutional Court challenge to decriminalise medically assisted dying, leaving the Health Minister and the Health Professions Council of SA (HPCSA) to contest the case.


WC man fights for the right to die

Dieter Harck (76) who has been living with motor neurone disease since 2013 is battling for the right to die.


ConCourt to address two key cases this week

The Constitutional Court will today hear arguments in former Presidents Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma’s legal bid to have former Justice Sisi Khampepe recuse herself from the TRC inquiry... and it will deliver judgment in the rand-fixing saga tomorrow.


Didiza will not oppose interdict application

National Assembly SpeakerThoko Didiza will not oppose President Cyril Ramaphosa’s application to interdict the Impeachment Committee, despite a legal opinion from the state law adviser that says it is her legal duty to do so.


Controversial ‘influencer’ guilty of hate speech

Controversial traditional leader and ‘influencer’ Ngizwe Mchunu has been found guilty of hate speech, harassment and discrimination against gay, lesbian and transgender people by the Equality Court, sitting in Johannesburg.


Woman challenges pension rule in divorce

The Constitutional Court yesterday heard arguments in an application to have a section of the Divorce Act declared unconstitutional, which prevents spouses married out-of-community of property (without accrual) from claiming a share of each other’s pension interests at divorce, writes The Star.


ConCourt buckling under flood of frivolous lawsuits

Meritless litigation is flooding the Constitutional Court, leading to triple the workload since 2010 and triggering a severe backlog crisis. The findings were released by Freedom Under Law (FUL) yesterday.


ConCourt delivers ‘huge victory’ for practitioners

The Constitutional Court says government cannot force healthcare providers to apply for a certificate of need (CON) that controls where they can and cannot work, and what services they can provide.


ConCourt bars repeat asylum applications

The Constitutional Court has overturned a SCA ruling that allowed asylum seekers whose applications had been denied to reapply while remaining in the country.


Crisis talks after damning ConCourt ruling

The ANC is scram­bling for ways to post­pone or avert an impeach­ment pro­cess for Pres­id­ent Cyril Ram­a­phosa over the Phala Phala scan­dal – and the DA, its biggest part­ner in the GNU, says it will not neces­sar­ily throw him a life­line.


ConCourt to hear NSPCA's animal care case

The SA Hunters and Game Conservation Association has no regard for the well-being of animals and is merely driven by commercial interests, the NSPCA will tell the Constitutional Court this month.


Call for justice in Phala Phala matter

As the Constitutional Court is expected to deliver a judgment tomorrow in the landmark Phala Phala case involving President Cyril Ramaphosa, opposition parties and political experts have called for justice, saying the apex court should finally hold the President accountable.


Media wins application to photograph rape accused

The Western Cape High Court has granted the media permission to photograph Leano Vergotine on trial for multiple counts of child rape and pornography, reports the Cape Times.


NHI challenge proceeds this week

The Con­sti­tu­tional Court will this week hear two high-stakes chal­lenges to the NHI Act that cast the spot­light on how Par­lia­ment con­sidered pub­lic input on the legis­la­tion.


Mbeki and Zuma recusal bid delays accountability

The bid by former Pres­id­ents Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma to have retired justice Sisi Khampepe removed as chair of a com­mis­sion is ‘effect­ively delay­ing’ their account­ab­il­ity on alleg­a­tions of polit­ical inter­fer­ence, com­mis­sion evid­ence leader Ish­mael Semenya argues in court papers.


Tolashe’s SUVs delivered to Luthuli House

Two luxury Chinese-made SUVs at the centre of a donation scandal appeared at Luthuli House this weekend, days after ANC Women’s League (ANCWL) president Sisisi Tolashe claimed she had kept them in her family to ‘safeguard’ them from creditors.


ConCourt gears for epic NHI challenge

Pres­id­ent Cyril Ram­a­phosa will tell the Con­sti­tu­tional Court that the con­ten­tious National Health Insur­ance (NHI) rep­res­ents a step for­ward in redress­ing the unequal health-care sys­tem inher­ited from the apartheid regime, which excluded black people.


Damage cannot be undone, judge notes in ‘no-name’ case

A landmark courtroom battle over the controversial ‘no-name law’ – a provision that makes it a criminal offence to publish the identity of a person accused of a sexual offence before they have formally pleaded in court – began in the Western Cape High Court yesterday.





Mentioned in